Rule 15(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure ……………………….35įoman v. People of the State of California, 355 US 230 78 Sup. Court for the Eastern District of California (1997) 07-15221 9 th Circ (2008)……………………17Ĭity of Canton Ohio v. Alabama Board of Corrections, Et Al., Defendants, James Towns, Defendant-Appellant Cross-Appellee. Willie James Glover, Plaintiff-Appellee Cross-Appellant, v. International Brotherhood Of Electrical Workers, Local 48 237 F.3d 1001 (9th Cir. State of Missouri Department of Corrections Letter…………………….A-1 PLAINTIFF WAS ENTITLED TO A JURY OF CITIZENS TO DECIDE IF THIS CASE WAS A CONTINUATION OF THE HABITUAL VIOLATIONS OF PLAINTIFF’S/APPELLANT’S CIVIL AND HUMAN RIGHTS AS A UNITED STATES CITIZEN…………………………….17Į. COURT ALSO REFUSED TO ADDRESS THAT SPRINGFIELD POLICE LIED ON THE POLICE REPORT WHICH ITSELF IS A FELONY AND WHETHER CHOICE/CLARION HOTELS LIED ABOUT THE EMPLOYMENT OF MOHHAMAD SALEM……………………………………………………………… ……16ĭ. A JURY MUST DECIDE IF CIVIL AND HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATIONS OCCURRED. DISPUTED MATERIAL FACTS LISTED AS FACTS AND USED GUILTY PLEA NOT AUTHORIZED BY APPELLANT AS THE MAIN REASON FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND THE ORDERĭISMISSING THE ENTIRE COURTACTION.………………………….15Ĭ. STANDARD OF REVIEW AND CONTROLLING LAW………….12ī. Their oath of office to serve and protect the people. Property is safe from confiscation with the loss of freedom and liberty toįollow leading to bondage and slavery to those officials, who have breached Servant officials that are fearful of not protecting the unalienable rights of itsĬitizens, if a group of public officials pursue tyranny no persons life or A God-fearing people must have a civil government of public Made him even more determined to try and attain some small amount of Has caused more mental stress and anguish for Appellant Reed and Hats to create a web of legal maneuvers to make the case go away which Parties involved have tried to pull every rabbit they could out of their Lastly, rather than admitting mistakes and settling the case most of the The fourth question and issue which the District Court erred and failed toĪddress is that the City has had a habitual track record for arresting Steven Reed was arrested at the event for handing out leaflets that said
#THE FIFTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS SAME AS SUPREME COURT TV#
Over 300 people including 3 TV camerasĪnd several news paper reporters saw the event which included a total Sitting in a car that was pulled forward and told he was heading to jailĭuring a four hour wait. The third claim concerns mental stress and anguish in thatĪppellant Reed was illegally arrested and detained and was actually Of Steven Reed and the other parties at the event. The minds of governmental authorities, the police, Choice Hotels andĬlarion officials including the chief of security to violate the civil rights The Second question involves the participation of the meeting of Report) and using bogus charges of trespassing at a publiclyĪdvertised public political event in which the public was invited. The police misconduct and cover-up of the facts, (lying on a police The initial questions presented is whether the claims arose from To participate in influencing and participating in governmental This case involves interpretation of the Federal and StateĬonstitution concerning freedom of speech and the right of the citizens CHOICE HOTELS INTERNATIONAL, ET AL DEFENDANT/APPELLEEĪPPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTįOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI (Southern)